Brian Jason Wagner: Swift wins 5-year restraining order, timeline
TL;DR:
- A judge granted Swift a 5-year restraining order on Sep 22, 2025.
- Court papers say Brian Jason Wagner must stay 100 yards away.
- Order also bars contact and bans guns and body armor, per TMZ.
- Reports say Wagner is a 45-year-old Colorado man tied to prior visits.
- Security around Swift has increased as the case moves forward.
On September 22, 2025, a Los Angeles judge granted Taylor Swift a 5-year restraining order against Brian Jason Wagner. TMZ reported that the order requires Wagner to stay at least 100 yards from Swift, her home, vehicle, and places of work. The order also bans him from contacting her and bars him from owning firearms, ammunition, or body armor during the term. TMZ stated the ruling came after Swift’s team submitted court filings detailing repeated uninvited visits and false claims by Wagner.
Yahoo’s entertainment vertical carried the same update later on September 22, summarizing the order’s terms and echoing the source court filings.
Who is Brian Jason Wagner
Entertainment and news outlets identify Wagner as a 45-year-old Colorado resident. In June 2025, Rolling Stone and Billboard reported that Swift first obtained a temporary order after saying Wagner had appeared at her Los Angeles home multiple times and claimed a relationship that did not exist. Those outlets said a judge required Wagner to remain 100 yards away and set later court dates.
Newer reports from IndiaTimes on September 23, 2025, describe the permanent order and repeat key claims from earlier filings, including that Wagner made false statements about a child and tried to tie official records to Swift’s address. Treat these claims as allegations recorded in court filings and reported by outlets.
Key dates and timeline
The table below compiles dates reported across multiple outlets. Dates are stated as reported in court documents and news stories.
| Date | Event | Reported by |
| Jul 2024 to May 2025 | Series of uninvited visits to Swift’s L.A. home alleged in filings | Rolling Stone, Billboard |
| Jun 6, 2025 | Swift petitions for a temporary order | Billboard |
| Jun 9–10, 2025 | Temporary restraining order granted, 100-yard distance | Rolling Stone, Billboard, The Guardian |
| Sep 21–23, 2025 | Reports of heightened security and ongoing search efforts surface | BroBible, IndiaTimes |
| Sep 22, 2025 | Judge grants 5-year restraining order with no-contact and firearms ban | TMZ, Yahoo |
What the new order says
TMZ cites court documents that set core terms. Wagner must keep at least 100 yards away and cannot contact Swift in person, by letter, or digitally. He must surrender any guns, ammo, or body armor to police. TMZ also reported that Wagner did not appear at the hearing and that filings list him as living in Colorado. These details reflect a standard structure in California civil harassment orders, but the length here, five years, is significant.
Security posture around Swift
Outlets outside the U.S. entertainment press have covered a recent uptick in security steps around Swift. BroBible on September 22–23 wrote that a private investigator said Wagner’s location was uncertain, prompting tighter surveillance. IndiaTimes on September 23 added that fans flagged an Instagram account that appears to show obsessive posts, though this link has not been verified by authorities. These reports explain the larger context but should be treated with care, since they rely on secondary sourcing.
Background for new readers
In June 2025, multiple reputable outlets documented Swift’s temporary restraining order against Wagner. Rolling Stone and Billboard both described sworn statements where Swift said Wagner had shown up several times, made false claims about a relationship, and tried to connect official documents to her address. The Guardian separately summarized those filings and noted a June 30 hearing date that set the stage for a longer order. Those pieces provide the baseline for understanding the September 22 ruling.
What happens next
Court orders of this type rely on service and enforcement. The new 5-year order is clear on distance, contact, and weapons bans. If Wagner violates it, police can arrest him and prosecutors can file charges. If he obeys, the order stays in place through September 22, 2030.
For Swift’s team, the practical steps are routine but serious. They include sharing the order with venue security, tour staff, building managers, and local police when she travels. They also include digital monitoring for direct contact attempts. Fans should avoid engaging with unverified social posts claiming personal ties to Swift. If they see threats or doxxing, they should report them to platforms and law enforcement, not amplify them.
Reader guide: how to vet claims you see online
- Look for named reporters and outlets with legal documents or direct quotes.
- Check whether a story cites filings, not just unnamed “sources.”
- Compare at least two independent reports.
- Treat social posts and screenshots as unconfirmed until corroborated.
- Do not share personal data of private individuals.
Why it matters
High-profile stalking cases can ripple beyond one person. They stress public safety at events, strain local police, and can push fans into rumor loops. Clear reporting and careful sharing reduce harm. Court orders set boundaries and give police tools to respond. Swift’s case also shows how online claims can spill into the real world. Knowing how to read verified updates helps everyone stay safe and calm.
Sources:
- TMZ, “Taylor Swift Granted Restraining Order Against Ex-Convict Stalker,” https://www.tmz.com/2025/09/22/taylor-swift-granted-restraining-order-stalker/, 2025-09-22.
- Yahoo Entertainment, “Taylor Swift Granted Restraining Order Against Ex-Convict Stalker,” https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/taylor-swift-granted-restraining-order-225202791.html, 2025-09-22.
- IndiaTimes, “Who is Brian Jason Wagner? Taylor Swift’s stalker…,” https://indiatimes.com/trending/who-is-brian-jason-wagner-taylor-swifts-stalker-is-a-middle-aged-dad-who-allegedly-calls-the-superstar-my-wife-tay-on-instagram-671132.html, 2025-09-23.
- Rolling Stone, “Taylor Swift Gets Restraining Order Against Stalker,” https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/taylor-swift-restraining-order-los-angeles-stalker-1235359659/, 2025-06-09.
- Billboard, “Taylor Swift Gets Restraining Order Against Alleged L.A. Stalker,” https://www.billboard.com/pro/taylor-swift-restraining-order-la-stalker/, 2025-06-09.
- The Guardian, “Taylor Swift granted restraining order against alleged stalker,” https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jun/10/taylor-swift-granted-restraining-order-against-alleged-stalker, 2025-06-10.
BroBible, “Taylor Swift Increases Security As Alleged Stalker Goes Missing,” https://brobible.com/culture/article/taylor-swift-increases-security-stalker-missing/, 2025-09-22.
